Is this a legitimate analogy?
Tell me what’s wrong with this analogy, or right
I’ll make an analogy referring to this:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25355584/
Our prescription drugs kill us in large numbers
PMID: 25355584
DOI: 10.20452/pamw.2503
Free article
Abstract
Our prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer in the United States and Europe. Around half of those who die have taken their drugs correctly; the other half die because of errors, such as too high a dose or use of a drug despite contraindications. Our drug agencies are not particularly helpful, as they rely on fake fixes, which are a long list of warnings, precautions, and contraindications for each drug, although they know that no doctor can possibly master all of these. Major reasons for the many drug deaths are impotent drug regulation, widespread crime that includes corruption of the scientific evidence about drugs and bribery of doctors, and lies in drug marketing, which is as harmful as tobacco marketing and, therefore, should be banned. We should take far fewer drugs, and patients should carefully study the package inserts of the drugs their doctors prescribe for them and independent information sources about drugs such as Cochrane reviews, which will make it easier for them to say "no thanks".
Analogy:
Let’s say I behave in some manner that becomes a leading cause, the third leading cause, of death, in fact, among the entire population of the USA and Europe. Imagine it …somehow …my ordinary behavior becomes the cause of more deaths than any other cause of death besides the top two, heart disease and cancer.
What kind of behavior? Let’s say I walk around everywhere (!), all over the US and Europe swinging an axe in wide arcs as I walk through crowds and wherenot.
I don’t intend to kill anyone. I’m just exercising and doing science. Science makes the world a better place. I do science! And I can show many beneficiaries of my behavior, my work. So many are helped by coming in contact with my axe, many receiving nice haircuts and shaves, for example.
The regulators agree with my behavior. They generally consider it necessary. True, I’ve given them bags of money, but that has no influence on their behavior.
Despite my benevolence and generally good intentions, a whole hell of a lot of people end up dead. There’s carnage everywhere.
Such were things as they were before. Until recently. The future looks bright. A few years ago I persuaded enough people (authorities) that coming into contact with my axe is henceforth required of all citizens/residents. Yes, everyone will face my axe, several times a year. Yes. Every year at least once, and in some years 2, 3, maybe 5 times a year.
3rd place ain’t good enough and now certainly the trophy podium will be ours, first place and world records.
And absolutely,
Clean shaves and sharp haircuts for many!
Introspection anyone?
We don’t need introspection. We’re SCIENCE! What are you, an anti-axxer ?
You don’t like democracy freedom Führers compelling every human being, every single blade of grass on earth into continuous contact with my wide-arc axxine?
You’re an anti-axxer!
And I call this ANTI SCIENCE AGGRESSION. Anti axe activism is anti science aggression. And anti science aggression is now a major killing force:
For background, see “There is government, only organized crime”:
The World Health Organization has published a video claiming that people opposed to the COVID jabs are “anti-science” and a “major killing force.”
In a recently published video on the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Twitter page, Dr. Peter Hotez said that “anti-vaccine activism” is “anti-science aggression” and links people who refused the COVID injections to the “far right.”
The WHO has made this wholesale condemnation of “anti-vaccine activists” despite the fact that many people have been seriously injured or even died after receiving the experimental COVID jabs. A Swiss study for instance found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people, with 2.8 percent showing levels associated with subclinical myocarditis.
Furthermore, a group of scientists recently conducted a risk-benefit analysis which showed that getting a COVID-19 “booster shot” is at least 18 times more dangerous than catching the virus itself for young people under the age of 30.
However, the WHO’s showcased physician did not acknowledge these facts in his rant.
“We have to recognize that anti-vaccine activism, which I actually call anti-science aggression, has now become a major killing force globally,” Hotez said in the video, using a backdrop of photos of protestors against the COVID shots.
The University Professor of Biology at Baylor College of Medicine claimed that “during the COVID pandemic in the United States, 200,000 Americans needlessly lost their lives because they refused a COVID vaccine, even after vaccines became widely available.”
“And now the anti-vaccine activism is expanding across the world […].”
“It’s a killing force,” Hotez proclaimed. “Anti-science now kills more people than things like gun violence, global terrorism, nuclear proliferation, or cyber-attacks.”
The scientist did not provide evidence for this dramatic claim.
“And now it’s become a political movement,” he continued. “In the U.S. it’s linked to far [sic] extremism on the far right, same in Germany.”
“So this is a new face of anti-science aggression. And so we need political solutions to address this.”
The doctor did not provide evidence in the video that opposition to the dangerous, experimental COVID jabs is linked to extremists.
Hotez is a pediatrician who works in the field of vaccine research and development and, in addition to his post at Baylor College of Medicine, is the Chair of Tropical Pediatrics at Texas Children’s Hospital.
READ: Bill Gates involved in new pandemic planning exercise with health, political, financial leaders
The WHO is known for its radical pro-abortion stance and promotion of “abortion access” all around the world.
Its current director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, was a member of the Ethiopia’s communist Tigray People’s Liberation Front and served its Minister of Health when it was in power. The party was declared a terrorist organization by the Ethiopian government in 2021.
Hotez appears to be very close to Ghebreyesus, as he recently described him as “my brother and mentor Dr. Tedros,” in a Tweet responding to the murder of the WHO director’s uncle.
American kids, by the way, born in the last 2 decades are subjected to 84 CDC-recommended vaccine injections, 84 INJECTIONS by age 18. That’s according to the CDC vaccine schedule and not even counting covid jabs which are added to that total.
A comment on the WHO video:
Another comment:
Yeesh, this is the third declaration I have heard the past few days, identifying any critical thinker/not juiced up as 1. Someone that has mental health issues and needs meds or an institution 2. The WHO saying we are terrorists, 3. And now this.
Is there truly progress being made in putting this craziness down, or is that simply delusion? So many events and declarations that one's head spins daily.
It IS a cult.
"Many people made an unflattering comparison [German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach] with someone from the past. I wonder why." [S Côté]. Video: https://t.me/robinmg/25458
"We have the research from DARPA and RAND from the 1960s and 70s on how to modify people's behavior and also how to take over the government.
Then we have the research from Guantanamo Bay and the torture programs on how to modify behavior through isolation (e.g. social distancing, masks) and other forms of repeated ritual behavior.
Those themes were combined with understanding of IT and how it could be used to induce a passive, narcissistic, self-indulgent, and decadent culture among people, especially the mid-level fake ruling class." Emanuel Pastreich
Full Interview: https://geopoliticsandempire.com/2022/12/10/emanuel-pastreich-covid-19-was-a-global-coup-by-private-finance-it-intelligence-complexes
From Dr. Mike Yeadon:
Folks,
I was just writing a briefing note for myself and it grew into this, which might be useful for some.
I don’t think I’ll ever accept or recommend another vaccine & sincerely wish I’d checked the facts on the established ones & didn’t wait for covid to point out to me how corrupt politicians are.
I do recognize that we mostly took at face value what was claimed for most products, pharmaceutical companies and non.
We’d have thought that a reasonable stance, because we know each industry sector is regulated and, in addition, surely ordinary people would stop companies deliberately harming others?
Well, yes. These assumptions rest upon other assumptions, that there isn’t such a thing as “regulatory capture” (where government employees are tempted to bend the rules in exchange for benefits, generally deferred).
Also, the assumption that there aren’t many people & organisations intent on accruing & using power over ever greater proportions of the population.
In fact, I don’t think that there are many truly terrible / evil people. There are probably only a few thousand people around the world who are, for reasons I’ll never understand, intent on seizing power at an extraordinary level.
The big problem we have is a very much larger group of people who are easily swayed by greed or fear to enact the wishes of the tiny group of evil perpetrators. Who are they, the enablers? This is MY personal take. They’re not in any particular order.
1. Pretty much all healthcare staff.
2. Those who create or communicate “content” for high-reach media entities, because people like to trust those they virtually invite into their homes every day on TV.
3. Politicians (almost all of them, whether active or passive).
4. Seniormost staff & a very small number of well-placed employees of huge pharmaceutical companies.
5. An analogously small number of decision-makers in the regulatory environment.
6. “Law enforcement”, not only police, judiciary & the covert services but also technocrats & civil servants, lying with statistics.
7. Only in the modern era have “Influencers” taken centre stage, but they’re oh so important now. In UK, people like “Professor” Devi Sridhar, TV Doctor Hillary, football pundit Gary Lineker & more.
8. *Philanthropaths everywhere, like Gates, Soros, Oprah Winfrey, who deploy billions of dollars of seemingly generous efforts to save the planet.
9. Some of your own friends and family, perhaps. Quite likely & tragically. They’re just aligning to what they believe is the right to do.
10. People I’ve missed out. Oh, like the WEF, the UN, the WHO, the EU, the Group of XX (most important nations), the Council for Foreign Relations, the IPCC, etc
Those who insist that we’re destroying earth’s climate through global warming (we’re definitely not) & that there are too many people (also not true) provide convenient partial excuses for the “unavoidably undemocratic processes, necessary to save the planet”.
Borderline genius, is this. It also offers a believable explanation for why we’re being subject increasingly authoritarian control. “Having tried democratic methods to accomplish a needed change, & failed, this is something we’ve just got to do”.
I forgot banks. Makes me realise that the ultimate movers & shakers are more or less out of site & certainly beyond reach. A large fraction of those above deserve whatever is the prevailing punishment for convicted murderers or accessories to the fact.
I don’t expect this lot to be brought before a justice system that’d beyond corruption. But we don’t need that in order to thwart their plans.
To defer, deflect or derail their intended future for us, “the little people”, that’s all we need to accomplish. In every dimension, be awkward, don’t follow their diabolical agendas. I expect they’ll have a flexible timeline, but it won’t be open-ended (“2030: you’ll own nothing & be happy”).
If we’re able to slow them down just a little bit, I expect they’ll have to move more quickly & that’s when their mistakes will become to be easier to see & opposition will grow.
A few months old, but new to me. Very calm evidence-givers, describing situations entirely consistent with the lies and fakery, destructive official policies, which are wholly inappropriate & ineffective, coupled with injections which are toxic-by-design.
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/COVID-AMNESIA:2
And a (new) religion.
Vaccines are the new body of Christ, the new communion, science = dogma, drugs the savior, Fauci the new God…|
Propaganda measured
I watched US propaganda from its regular news media since I was a kid, starting in about 1983 or so. I mean, at that point I started paying attention to it, reading/watching it as… this is what they want to communicate to us, let’s see what they mean with the words they say…
US propaganda has been high intensity and pervasive since I started watching it. But things have changed very much for the worse over the last 20 years and broke the meter over the last 6 or 8 years. I mean, any intensity-measuring equipment not only broke but was so overloaded it burned and vaporized.
The covid narrative went even beyond that, from its first day in early 2020.
Typical US propaganda is about a 6 to 8 out of 10 on the intensity of messaging meter, on a scale from 1 to 10. Covid was from its first moments a 300.
And so I said, from the first moment, and since, that my days are numbered. From their so-called logic, that of their covid narrative, they’ll soon enough be dragging me out of the house and into a camp. Or more likely, something like Bucha:
NETFLIX TIMES: NYT - The media wing of US military-industrial complex, has just released a sequel on BUCHA - just as Ukraine silences priests (https://t.me/IntelRepublic/10816) for going against their Bucha narrative (https://t.me/IntelRepublic/5397), the publication magically comes across Hollywood-style evidence in support of Kiev's version of events.
Part 1 of NYT's warmongering series (see picture 2) was an accomplice to killing and displacing millions of Iraqis, yet NYT continue with the same journalistic "integrity" in 2022 aimed at destroying nations.
This is a good place to remind, or inform anyone who hasn’t noticed, that the pre-eminent western nations’ (US/EU/UK, etc) communications technique is PROJECTION:
Accuse the (an) OTHER of precisely those crimes, and outcomes/effects and motivations…, that belong precisely to YOU.
That this is in fact the primary rhetorical technique employed by political and other officials in the west is well known, well documented, admitted even from official sources and even bragged about in mass media. It is indisutable, too, just LOOK at what they say and what they do.
Case study archetypal PROJECTION:
“We have to recognize that anti-vaccine activism, which I actually call anti-science aggression, has now become a major killing force globally,” Hotez said in the video, using a backdrop of photos of protestors against the COVID shots.
The University Professor of Biology at Baylor College of Medicine claimed that “during the COVID pandemic in the United States, 200,000 Americans needlessly lost their lives because they refused a COVID vaccine, even after vaccines became widely available.”
“And now the anti-vaccine activism is expanding across the world […].”
“It’s a killing force,” Hotez proclaimed. “Anti-science now kills more people than things like gun violence, global terrorism, nuclear proliferation, or cyber-attacks.”
The scientist did not provide evidence for this dramatic claim.
“And now it’s become a political movement,” he continued. “In the U.S. it’s linked to far [sic] extremism on the far right, same in Germany.”
“So this is a new face of anti-science aggression. And so we need political solutions to address this.”
What they say about OTHERS is precisely true of THEMSELVES.
As a propaganda/mass communication technique of control, obfuscation, mind-fuckery and whatnot, it is exceptionally effective.