Actual reality remains completely unrecognizable to most people, due to the maximal reality distortion era we’ve now certainly entered
How to exit the funhouse mirror zone, who knows? But I say it starts with admitting there’s a problem
Jack Matlock’s assessment here https://ccisf.org/ambassador-jack-matlocks-analysis-of-international-laws-and-treaties/ meets all the criteria of reasonableness, in my opinion, as does Russian foreign policy typically. Another example: Syria. The video here:
is pretty clearly representative of actual reality, and totally contrary to the portrayals we all get on our news channels in the US and Europe. I know this because of the credibility of people who report on Syria seriously. And also because I’ve paid very close attention to US news media for over 40 years and I know what it does and how it does it. It’s not a pretty picture.
You asked what am I FOR?
I’m for upholding at least a minimal amount of truthfulness and honesty, that public institutions uphold at least a minimal degree of reasonableness, in their policies and behaviors; where there is corruption in business and politics that the corruption is kept confined within some kind of sensible/reasonable limit. Basically I’m FOR reasonable limits on power. And I’m AGAINST absolute power without limits.
I recommend not underestimating the intentions and capabilities of those behind the “Great Reset”, nor their reach (their “penetration” as Herr Schwab puts it). A review of their scope here: https://brownstone.org/articles/the-next-step-for-the-world-economic-forum and a note about their NEW book here (The Great Narrative):
In the brownstone article you can see more about “their” intended forthcoming domination schemes related to “healthcare”. And we can put that in the context of actual reality as shown clearly here: https://softwaredevelopmentperestroika.wordpress.com/2022/02/22/once-in-hundred-years-pandemic/ . Actual reality remains completely unrecognizable to most people, due to the maximal reality distortion era we’ve now certainly entered. How to exit the funhouse mirror zone, who knows? But I say it starts with admitting there’s a problem.
“The idea of stakeholder capitalism and multi-stakeholder partnerships might sound warm and fuzzy, until we dig deeper and realise that this actually means giving corporations more power over society, and democratic institutions less.
The plan from which the Great Reset originated was called the Global Redesign Initiative. Drafted by the WEF after the 2008 economic crisis, the initiative contains a 600-page report on transforming global governance. In the WEF’s vision, “the government voice would be one among many, without always being the final arbiter.” Governments would be just one stakeholder in a multi-stakeholder model of global governance. Harris Gleckman, senior fellow at the University of Massachusetts, describes the report as “the most comprehensive proposal for re-designing global governance since the formulation of the United Nations during World War II.””
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ugcPost-6902124407800627200-VWcE
https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/the-eus-fit-for-55-farm-to-fork-and