4000 covid ICU = vaccinate 10 million people?
Data from Sweden: with the full arsenal of tools (or THE tool: covid vaccine) deployed as it was, then what impact did that have on respiratory illness overall?
And in Sweden:
in 2020, number of Swedes hospitalized (ICU) with covid: 4178.
in 2021, number of Swedes hospitalized (ICU) with covid: 4075.
Number of doses of covid vaccine injected, what, about 17,000,000? (and these are ALL benefit and ZERO risk too; they’re like drinking moderate amounts of fresh clean water)
That makes so much sense!
Science!
Why not count ALL respiratory disease ICU admissions, and compare 2020, 2021 and 2022 to the last 10 years? That will say something that matters about covid vaccines. Who actually thinks we don’t live IN A WORLD OF VIRUSES? You think there’s only covid and variants in the complex of human respiratory illness? Here is the core of the stupidity of covid narrative/policy/official “expertise”.
How about the public expenditure? Just only for covid TESTS, in Sweden, how much was spent?
12 billion SEK, just for coronavirus testing. DN says it’s even worse, 22 billion SEK, just for testing.
How much is that? Well at the low figure, 12 billion, that’s 12% of Sweden’s entire budget for healthcare. 20% of Sweden’s budget for defense (military), just for testing.
Add the cost of the vaccines to that. No doubt they cost more than the tests.
If you take the higher DN figure for covid tests (22 billion) and then add the same cost to it, for covid vaccines (which is probably less than they cost), then now you are well over 40% of the total healthcare budget for Sweden, just for covid tests and injections. 40% of the entire healthcare budget for Sweden.
What a racket
Support for covid vaccination, and confidence in news media, celebrities, and public officials remains strong, apparently due to belief in the necessity of doing something about “the virus”.
But we live in A WORLD OF VIRUSES, of so many viruses, so many of which contribute to the complex of human respiratory illness. ICU admissions data for all respiratory disease should be found, to compare recent years (2020 - 2022) hyper focused on one type of virus, to the last 10 years or more on those terms: ALL respiratory disease ICU admission.
One can reasonably ask, with the full arsenal of tools (or THE tool: covid vaccine) deployed as it was, then what impact did that have on respiratory illness overall?
For example, if covid ICU admissions were reduced (actually they were the same in 2020 and 2021, but assume they were reduced), then did other non-covid contagions take covid’s place? Maybe you could conclude this if you look at annual respiratory illness figures for the last 10 years and see that they remain basically constant, which, actually, they have, in, for example, Germany.
SCB https://www.scb.se gives the answers on covid ICU for 2020 (4178 patients) and 2021 (4075 patients). SCB also gives covid deaths for each year and all cause deaths for each year. These have been reported carefully by Tommy Lennhamn for the last 18 months and Sweden has had lower all cause mortality than Nordic neighbors both years as usual https://softwaredevelopmentperestroika.wordpress.com/?s=Nordics, and near all time low mortality.
Since 1900, 114 years were deadlier in Sweden than 2020, according to SCB. https://softwaredevelopmentperestroika.wordpress.com/2022/01/11/sweden-2021-covid-deaths-summary-anno-covidus-ii-final-report/
What I do not know is figures for hospitalization due to all respiratory diseases in Sweden each year. I found these graphs for Germany though:
Taking it back just to Sweden, here is Swedish mortality (deaths/population) since 1900. The remarkable recent year is 2019, Sweden’s least deadly year ever. A bit of regression to the mean in 2020, still 7th least deadly in the last 120 years:
Just recently, a journalist is asking questions of Swedish health officials. Here I copy a recent article, google translated:
https://nyadagbladet.se/debatt/sa-manipulerar-folkhalsomyndigheten-med-vaccinstatistiken/
DEBATE
"How the Public Health Agency manipulates vaccine statistics"
With the definition that the Swedish Public Health Agency applies and the media conveys, the majority of suspected vaccinated individuals are classified as "unvaccinated". It is not only a medical-bureaucratic scandal but to the highest degree also a journalistic and social one, writes journalist Per Shapiro.
PUBLISHED 03 FEB 2022
Anyone who trawls through the Public Health Agency's diary can find an email from Björn Hammarskjöld, who is a professor of pediatrics. He criticizes the definitions of vaccinated and unvaccinated that the authority applies:
" According to science, law, ethics and morality, these definitions are not only incorrect, they must be regarded as misconduct in research. If you are unvaccinated, the skin has not yet been penetrated by a needle containing a medical preparation called a vaccine. ”
Hammarskjöld's definition is as close to common sense as you can get. But the Public Health Agency thus uses completely different criteria which read as follows:
“ Currently, those who have been vaccinated with two doses of covid-19 vaccine are considered vaccinated. It must have been at least two weeks since the last dose was given. ”
That is to say: "unvaccinated" are people who have not received a dose, who have only received one dose, and who have received two doses, but where it has not yet been two weeks since the last time.
Here are two insidious magic tricks. On the one hand, the actual control group is destroyed, and the unvaccinated are bundled with those who have received one dose and those who have received two doses, depending on how much time has elapsed since the injection.
On the one hand, the Swedish Public Health Agency consistently takes the outcomes during the critical period after each injection and records them in the group called "the unvaccinated". Research and clinical experience indicate that the most fragile of those vaccinated have an increased risk of developing severe covid and other infections during this critical period immediately after vaccination.
This is why you avoid vaccinating old and fragile people against seasonal flu in the middle of a galloping spread of infection. You always vaccinate before the season starts, precisely so as not to expose the risk group to the "two-front war" that can occur when the immune system is focused on handling the vaccine that enters the body and thus downplays the fight against a simultaneous infection. The virus can then multiply undisturbed, reach high levels and thus cause more severe disease symptoms. In the statistics, it has sometimes looked like a hump of hospitalizations and deaths, if this practice was not followed. 1, 2
What happens is that the Swedish Public Health Agency overwrites this "hump" on the unvaccinated's account. If we look at how the authority has proceeded in its comparisons, we clearly see a manipulative pattern.
Those who became infected, hospitalized and died during the first three weeks after the first dose are considered unvaccinated. They thus remove these infected, hospitalized and dead from the group vaccinated.
And those who became infected, hospitalized and died during the first two weeks after the second dose are also moved, but in this case from the group vaccinated twice to the group vaccinated with only one dose. Now it was the result for those who had received two doses that was beautified.
The consequence is that it always seems to go worse than it actually does for the unvaccinated.
It also benefits the image of the latest vaccination, whether it is dose 1, 2 or 3.
A British researcher who had access to Canadian data states that this manipulative measurement method has moved about 56 percent of all reported deaths from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated in the province of Alberta alone. 3 When I asked to see what the Public Health Agency's diagram looks like for the truly unvaccinated (ie according to the common sense definition that no vaccine against Covid-19 has yet been taken), I received the answer, that “The information requested is no longer produced ”.
These are not just any numbers. They are the basis for discriminatory measures against "the unvaccinated", which has almost become an insult in society today and created enormous division.
I do not think it needs to be said, but for the sake of safety: It is the person who wants to discriminate against someone because he or she has not taken a syringe who has the burden of proof to show that the discrimination is founded (isn’t unfounded).
The Swedish Public Health Agency defends itself by claiming that medically vaccinated people are considered to be after 2 injections and 2 weeks, because then they have received the expected protection. But then they must be clear to the public with how the definition reads. Of course, the media also have the same obligation. When they have consistently repeated the mantra that "X percent of those admitted to IVA are unvaccinated", they have turned into a megaphone for an unfounded smear.
Of course, it is also morally reprehensible to use new words that violate logic.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Vaccinated is unvaccinated.
Covid vaccines have broken all records in suspected side effects. At the time of writing, just over 96,000 suspected side effects have been reported to the Medical Products Agency. Of these reports, about 20 percent have been treated and at least 9,400 have been assessed as serious, of which 369 were deaths. 4
In the radio documentary "Testimonials from the vaccine country", I interview some of the countless Swedes who have had serious health problems shortly after the injection.
Several testify about how they woke up in the middle of the night with severe dizziness and stroke-like symptoms, many have experienced permanent damage.
However, with the definition applied by the Swedish Public Health Agency and passed on by the media, the majority of these suspected vaccine-damaged individuals are classified as "unvaccinated".
This is nothing but an inconceivable scandal, not only a medical-bureaucratic one but to a great extent also a journalistic and social one.
Our story will also be written one fine day. I would like to urge all editors and journalists to take the right side. You can never say again that you did not know better.
Per Shapiro
Sources and references:
1) The Lancet : Risk factors and disease profile of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK users of the COVID Symptom Study app: a prospective, community-based, nested, case-control study
2) Research Gate : Latest statistics on England mortality data suggest systematic mis-categorization of vaccine status
3) The Gateway Pundit : Half of vaccinated deaths have been counted as unvaccinated
4) The Medical Products Agency : Reported suspected side effects of coronary vaccinesAbout the writer
Per Shapiro is a journalist and author.
He has worked for many years as an investigative journalist, for P1 Documentary, Caliber and Assignment Review.
Since 2021, he runs the independent journalistic podcast Folkets Radio.
Truly Weird Definitions. Huh!
Anyone who trawls through the Public Health Agency's diary can find an email from Björn Hammarskjöld, who is a professor of pediatrics. He criticizes the definitions of vaccinated and unvaccinated that the authority applies:
" According to science, law, ethics and morality, these definitions are not only incorrect, they must be regarded as misconduct in research. If you are unvaccinated, the skin has not yet been penetrated by a needle containing a medical preparation called a vaccine. ”
Hammarskjöld's definition is as close to common sense as you can get. But the Public Health Agency thus uses completely different criteria which read as follows:
“ Currently, those who have been vaccinated with two doses of covid-19 vaccine are considered vaccinated. It must have been at least two weeks since the last dose was given. ”
That is to say: "unvaccinated" are people who have not received a dose, who have only received one dose, and who have received two doses, but where it has not yet been two weeks since the last time.
Apparently Swedish officials acknowledge the use of the definition that shifts the jabbed to the unvaxxed category, and dismiss the critique because the shift of jabbed to unvaxxed category makes little statistical difference, in Sweden. Possibly true in Sweden; the absolute numbers are very small in both groups in Sweden.
Yet one wonders:
1. Then why use those definitions? One can hypothesize that intentional shifting of the jabbed into the unvaxxed category is a definition designed to distort data, and perception. But assuming that is NOT the reason for use of the definition in Sweden, then what is the reason?
In Alberta, Canada these definitions are used, and they make a big impact on the statistics, favoring vaccines and disfavoring the vaccine-free, by a very significant degree, as discussed in detail in these articles:
2. Let’s see the actual data? It would be great to know the degree to which Sweden is different from Alberta.
The Machine: Evaluating Media Campaigns
I have been, I’ll self declare it, a heavy appetite reader of official rhetoric and news media in the USA since 1980. I try understand them, discern what they say, what they mean when they say things a certain way and so on. I’m at least as qualified as anyone to evaluate the quality of media campaigns.
This one about covid is a very special case, in a class by itself. Not in terms of quality. I also read beyond mainstream too, since a long time ago, and as usual, there was plenty of serious critical analysis this time, on this one, from serious people. I don’t exclude them. The mainstream smears against them are the usual, just, absolute, junk.
There are plenty of analyses and studies. Here is someone who writes and compiles data from around the world, and do not be fooled by the sometimes humorous and raging tone, it is someone who is very familiar with the subject. This is not an individual blogger, you can read things like this everywhere. There are beginning to be studies where one acknowledges the restrictions have done more harm than good.
As I say, this one’s in a class by itself. The covid media narrative in most of Europe and North America primes the pump, setting near half the population into some kind of mesmerized hate of anyone who doesn’t join their narrative and ritual. The rhetoric from these people, incited openly in mainstream media, has had one:
recalling the darkest days of superstition, witch hunts, pogroms, and
counting the days remaining.
Fortunately, for now, it looks like everyone gets a reprieve. Well, not everyone. The machine rolls on in some countries still.
Data from the USA
In my home country, the USA, they have had, very much UNLIKE Sweden, statistically significant increases in both hospitalization and death these last 2 years. There has been a lot of analysis, from serious people, qualified people, making a very clear case why. The most likely culprits are the combination of:
A. Systematic suppression of treatment for people presenting with respiratory illness. All kinds of treatment. People are told by their doctors that there is no treatment, to go home, to wait until they have trouble breathing, then to go to hospital.
B. At hospital they’re dosed with remdesivir as standard protocol, even though remdesivir was previously banned as too toxic FOR EBOLA PATIENTS. They’re also intubated.
I have a feeling, a hypothesis, that A and B are NOT systematically applied in Sweden. And that the lack of A and B account for the near normalcy of both hospitalization and death rates in Sweden.
Good analysis here by a Swedish doctor in Stockholm, Sebastian Rushworth, and with comparison of USA mortality to Swedish mortality. https://sebastianrushworth.com/2022/02/04/covid-officially-over-in-sweden/
But the same analysis of the Swedish data was already done MORE THAN ONE YEAR AGO ALREADY here: https://softwaredevelopmentperestroika.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/final-report-on-swedish-mortality-2020-anno-covid/
Of course such analyses were dismissed then as “bloggers, conspiracy theorists, YouTubers, right wingers, misogynists, racists, Trumpers, etc. How about now? Still the same. Maybe we can wait until the second coming of Christ before TV news and the NYT and Washington Post and your local rag cover reality sensibly, or (it’s a big ask), or, we can incorporate analysis from serious analysts now, even as they’re smeared in mass media.
Kyle Kemper
The brother of Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Kyle Kemper (in red flannel shirt) has interesting things to say:
See a second clip of Kemper here:
It’s all been a pack of lies. Sweden or not, the West is committing an apparent suicide, but in reality it is a murder.